Search
58 results returned for tackle
Clarification 3-2003
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification3-2003Union / HP Ref ManagerSRULaw Reference15,17Date2003-06-07Request SRU has requested a ruling with regard to Law 15-Tackle & Law 17 Maul: Team A win the ball in a line-out. The ball carrier is joined by several of hi ... s the maul, then he is liable to penalty. (2) By definition, given the abovementioned scenario, a tackl
Clarification 13-2003
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification13-2003Union / HP Ref ManagerSRULaw Reference15Date2003-08-18 This clarification was incorporated into law in 2009 Request The SRU has requested a ruling with regard the tackler, in Law 15. Under the definition of a tackl ... r as defined by Law. That player is not part of the tackle, as he has not gone to ground. He can only therefor
Clarification 1-2004
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification1-2004Union / HP Ref ManagerWRULaw Reference3,14Date2004-01-20 This clarification was incorporated into law in 2009 Request 1. The WRU has requested a ruling with regard Law 14 -Ball on the Ground-No Tackle. May a player lying on the ground during general play and not after a tackle, attempt to tackle a ball carrier?
Clarification 5-2005
y -Dangerous tackling. Does the action of deliberately lifting an opponent off his feet in a tackle s ... t in a tackle AND dropping or 'spearing' that player so that his head and/or upper body comes into contact with the ground first, is a dangerous tackle. 2. The dangerous play described in 1. abov
Clarification 7-2006
s of the defending Team B have not committed to make any contact or tackle of the ball carrying Team A. Pla ... g a tackle. Subsequently if the ball is not held by the lead player of the group of Team A players, and a Team B player attempts to tackle the ball carrier and cannot, then a PK should be awarded agains
Clarification 9-2004
e the offence is not intentional: e.g. mistimed (early or late, but not dangerous) tackle; unintentional instinctive high, but not dangerous, tackle -when an attacker steps inside a defender; certai ... d tackle (early or late, but not dangerous) • unintentional reactionary high tackle, but not dangerous.
Clarification 1-2010
s on his feet, and is on the tackled player’s side of the tackle. This player must release and re-ente ... n the Rulings for a player, who has always been on his side of the tackle, to release the ball.• As writte ... e)).Players arriving at a tackle may play the ball providing they are on their feet (Law 15.6 (b)).Player ... d player means the tackle has taken place and the revised Law 15.6 (c) (2009) makes that very clear.La
Clarification 6-2003
d to a ruling under Law 15 -Tackle and Law 17 -Maul. It is noted that the designated members rule ... d under the Tackle Law. Ruling of the designated members of the Rugby Committee 1. Under the definitio
Clarification 1-2014
d that this type of play may affect the game going forward as the “tackle” will be down played and the slappin ... r/tackler from team blue attempts to tackle from behind and makes contact with his hand on the bal
Clarification 8-2003
5 Tackle & Law 17 Maul: We would be grateful for clarification of your ruling of 7th June (Ruling 3:200 ... r to ground, then, under Law 7 mode of play, he is not liable to penalty, as this constitutes a tackl ... n complete a tackle in accordance with Law. (2) It is assumed by the wording of the original Law Rulin
18 Touch, quick throw and lineout
Sevens 18.8 Where the game is restarted with a lineout and which team throws in is determined as follows: a. General Event Location of the mark of touch Who throws in A player, in their own half, kicks the ball indirectly into touch in the opposition’s 22. Either the team did not take the ball into their half, or a tackle, ruck or maul took place within the half, or an opponent touche
Clarification 2-2018
s the “no offside lines at a tackle” issue, and that it wasnot intended to modify the way the bal ... e lines at a tackle” issue, and that it wasnot intended to modify the way the ball was conteste
Clarification 2-2022
y with law 15.16. In being consistent with other areas of Law (Scrum law 19.38a, tackle law 14.8d), w
Clarification 11-2003
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification11-2003Union / HP Ref ManagerNZRULaw Reference15,17Date2003-07-24Request NZRFU has requested a ruling with regard to Law 15 Tackle and Law 17 Maul: The NZRFU is in receipt of Ruling 3:2003. The Union seeks further clarification on the interpretation implicit in Ruling 3. In order to bring further clarity to wha
Clarification 3-2005
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification3-2005Union / HP Ref ManagerFPRLaw Reference21Date2005-06-30Request The FPR has requested a ruling with regard Law 21-Penalty & Free Kicks Black team are penalised for a tackle infringement 30 metres from their goal line; Blue team opt for a kick at goal, placing the ball on the mark and informing the refere
Clarification 7-2015
Clarification in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification7-2015Union / HP Ref ManagerIRFULaw Reference15,16,22Date2015-09-09Request We are concerned at the increasing practice of an opponent kicking the ball out of the hands of a player who has picked up the ball.This is happening mainly when the ball is won at the breakdown/tackle/ruck and has been picked up by a playe
Clarification 2-2021
e is to run past all his/her team-mates to either contest possession, tackle an opponent who catche
Clarification 2-2011
d to release the ball carrier given that this is a collapsed maul and not a tackle?b) Does the bal