Search
101 results returned for scrum zone
Clarification 1-2004
w player is sent from the field of play. At the next scrum a suitably trained front row replacement take ... n to the field of play at the time the next scrum is awarded after the sending off.
Clarification 2-2005
e, play will be brought back for a scrum with the team in possession at the time of the event to hav ... y will be brought back for a scrum with the team in possession at the time of the event to have the thro
Clarification 6-2005
r (No. 3) is temporary suspended. At the next scrum player No. 6 leaves the field to allow a replacemen ... g the period of temporary suspension for player No. 3). At the next scrum player No. 7 leaves the fiel
Clarification 3-2010
n both players go for it. The ball then goes dead. Question from above: Does Law 22.15 apply scrum ... w 22.15 applies and the referee awards a five metre scrum with the attacking team throws in the bal
Clarification 5-2016
l into in goal instead of scrum back to where ball originally kicked from http://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=22 see video at 22.9 (c). New Decision - scrum 5m attack instead of 22m drop out To be applied fro
Clarification 8-2014
e, they have two choices: to have a scrum formed at the centre of the 22-metre line from where the kic ... l without any delay, the referee's decision should be to apply Law 13.15. (option between a scru ... s: To have a scrum formed at the centre of the 22-metre line from where the kick was taken and they thro
Clarification 1-2025
Clarification in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby Committee Clarification 1-2025 Union / HP Ref Manager HP Referee Manager Law Reference 15 Date 23 June 2025 Request At a ruck/breakdown close to the goal line, the attacking scrum half picks up the ball and dives forward over the ruck in an attempt to score a try. Is this legal or shoul
Clarification 2-2026
Clarification in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby Committee Clarification 2-2026 Union / HP Ref Manager NZRU Law Reference 15 Date 1 June 2026 Request NZRU have asked: Are the actions of a scrum half moving beyond the back foot of the ruc ... y the laws in the context of the Charter as well. While the actions of the scrum half/half bac
Clarification 5-2015
r through blood or a HIA), can that team bring on a replacement, even though when the next scru ... g on a replacement, what should happen at the next scrum? If that team is allowed to brin
Clarification 9-2004
r; certain incidences of scrum collapsing. In these circumstances, the sanction of a penalty tr ... m: • a collapsed scrum • a collapsed maul • a defending player intentionally offside • a defending playe
3 Team
h organiser may stipulate that games can be played with reduced numbers in the scrum, unconteste
Clarification 2-2022
o that player can comply with law 15.16. In being consistent with other areas of Law (Scrum law 19.38
Clarification 7-2002
l kicked off again • to have a scrum at the centre and they have the throw -in, or • to accept the kic
Clarification 10-2004
s, the player has infringed this Law and a scrum to the opposing team should be ordered.
Clarification 3-2005
s of the Rugby Committee The abovementioned scenario is illegal, and the referee would order a scru
Clarification 2-2009
m above: 1. Is a try scored? 2. Is the player in touch-in-goal? 3. Is an attacking scrum 5m fro
Clarification 5-2009
g used all their nominated substitutes, continue to play with 14 players. When the first scrum afte
Clarification 8-2009
e accidental offside in accordance with Law 11. 6(a) when a scrum is awarded with the throw in to the no
Clarification 4-2016
n: Unless otherwise stated in Law any infringement by the kicker’s team results in a scrum at the mar
Clarification 4-2011
d a scrum with the non-offending team throwing in subject to advantage.
Clarification 2-2008
g team be awarded a Free Kick (or the option of a scrum) where the team that is unable to compl