Search
137 results returned for team
Clarification 8-2004
t The JRFU has requested a ruling with regard Law 15-Tackle. Team B ball carrier (“B-player”) is "held" (not tackled) by two Team A players (“A1-”, “A2-player”) and A1-player held on to the legs of ... r, as the result, A2 player is closer to the Team-B's goal line than B-player. Then B-player went to the groun
Clarification 3-2002
t and that he is not permitted to run into a gap in the Line-out to support a jumping team mate. Rulin
Clarification 7-2005
d that: "If the hindmost foot of a team is on or behind that team's goal-line, the off-side line is the goa
Clarification 9-2006
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification9-2006Union / HP Ref ManagerFFRLaw Reference17Date2006-11-29Request The FFR has requested a ruling with regard to Law 17 Maul 1. During a maul the ball carrier and one of his team mates leave the maul. a. Can an opponent tackle the ball carrier? b. Does the ball carrier have to be the lead player?
Clarification 4-2024
e and one water bottle, (solely for the kicker’s use) after a team has indicated they intend to kic ... e and one water bottle, (solely for the kicker’s use) after a team has indicated they intend to kic
Clarification 4-2015
s the referee and tells him that a player from the winning team was clearly offside in the ruc ... n to the non-infringing team, drop out or after a conversion or successful penalty kick at goa
Clarification 4-2002
d on the ground, the referee will allow the non-offending team to take a quick tap penalty/free kic ... m. The opportunity to play advantage by allowing the non-offending team to take a quick tap penalty/free kic
Clarification 1-2019
n used; A player is then suspected of concussion by the Team Doctor and is removed from pla
Clarification 1-2003
y to the receiver of the non-throwing team. (2) The receiver who has run into the lineout and does not tak
Clarification 6-2005
l the temporary suspension period for player No. 17 ends? Is there any difference if the team doe
Clarification 2-2009
t to the defending team.
Clarification 1-2011
r to the injury to the front row player and the team has used all its replacement players in which cas
Clarification 7-2015
t the offending team.
Clarification 5-2016
s://youtu.be/Qh2ABCXf1Z8 = New decision - 22m drop out as kicking team took ball into in goal instea
Clarification 2-2024
4 - the opposing team may begin their attempt to block the kick. Like in the JRFU example
Clarification 5-2014
s of that team from participating further in the game; this does not seem equitable and is contrary to wha
Clarification 3-2011
y apply and offside players (potentially an entire team) must retire 10m from where the ball land