Search

147 results returned for team

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 7-2003

d to the other team? Ruling of the designated members of the Rugby Committee Law 10.2 (c) relate

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 3-2018

y for an HIA and that team have exhausted all of its substitutions, is a temporary replacement allowe ... A and that team have exhausted all of its substitutions, is a temporary replacement allowed? Ye

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 2-2004

h, can a team use either one depending on the necessity? We suggest the team can have suitable traine

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 4-2005

d for player No.17 ends? Is there any difference if the team does not have any further front ro ... g the team has only 14 players on the field. Ruling 2 Player No. 6 can return to the field of pla

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 2-2014

g restriction on when a team can opt not to take the conversion and to instead restart play, what happen ... d the player or the TMO is consulted) which results in the clock going past 0.00? Lastly, if the team choose

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 3-2014

n or restart play? In relation to the timing restriction on when a team can opt not to tak ... s in the clock going past 0.00? Lastly, if the team chooses not to take the conversion do they have to be se

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 4-2016

n: Unless otherwise stated in Law any infringement by the kicker’s team results in a scrum at the mark. The opposing team throw in the ball. To be applied from: January 1st, 2017

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 1-2022

s of a player from each team on a loose ball? How should play be restarted when there is doubt abou ... s a restart of a 5m scrum, attacking team throws in. Law 19.1, table row 5, says that whe ... d. The attacking team throws in. Under the new Global Law Trials for season 2021-22, Laws 12 and 2

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 8-2004

9 Request The JRFU has requested a ruling with regard Law 15-Tackle. Team B ball carrier (“B-player”) is "held" (not tackled) by two Team A players (“A1-”, “A2-player”) and A1-player held on to the leg ... r, as the result, A2 player is closer to the Team-B's goal line than B-player. Then B-player wen

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 3-2002

t and that he is not permitted to run into a gap in the Line-out to support a jumping team mat

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 7-2005

d that: "If the hindmost foot of a team is on or behind that team's goal-line, the off-side lin

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 9-2006

Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby Committee Clarification 9-2006 Union / HP Ref Manager FFR Law Reference 17 Date 2006-11-29 Request The FFR has requested a ruling with regard to Law 17 Maul 1. During a maul the ball carrier and one of his team mates leave the maul. a. Can an opponent tackle the ball carrier? b. Does the ball carrier have to be the lead player? 2. During a mau

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 3-2012

d front row replacement for any reason, the team concerned shall not be entitled to replac

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 4-2024

r a team has indicated they intend to kick at goal, or a try has been scored. c)   &nbs ... y for the kicker’s use) after a team has indicated they intend to kick at goal, or a try has been score

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 4-2015

e immediately calls the referee and tells him that a player from the winning team was clearly offsid ... m, lineout, an option to the non-infringing team, drop out or after a conversion or successful penalt

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 1-2003

y to the receiver of the non-throwing team. (2) The receiver who has run into the lineout and doe

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 6-2005

f the field until the temporary suspension period for player No. 17 ends? Is there any difference if the tea

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 2-2009

p out to the defending team.

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 1-2011

s prior to the injury to the front row player and the team has used all its replacement players in whic

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 7-2014

Clarification in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby Committee Clarification 7-2014 Union / HP Ref Manager FPR Law Reference 20 Date 2014-11-26 Request The Federação Portuguesa de Rugby seeks clarification on the interpretation of Laws 20.9 (b) and (c). Scenario Team A are awarded a scrum. After winning the ball in the ensuing scrum, the hindmost player in that scrum grasps the bal

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 7-2015

y against the offending team.

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 5-2016

e/TSCC9iHV7cM = Try https://youtu.be/Qh2ABCXf1Z8 = New decision - 22m drop out as kicking team took bal

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 4-2002

l be engaged on the ground, the referee will allow the non-offending team to take a quick tap penalty/fre ... m. The opportunity to play advantage by allowing the non-offending team to take a quick tap penalty/fre

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 2-2024

n kicker next steps in any direction - as per Law 8.14 - the opposing team may begin their attemp

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 1-2019

s (8) have been used; A player is then suspected of concussion by the Team Doctor and is remove

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 3-2011

w would presumably apply and offside players (potentially an entire team) must retire 10m from wher

Laws of the Game > Law Clarifications
Clarification 5-2014

o members of that team from participating further in the game; this does not seem equitabl