Search
148 results returned for team-mate
21 In-goal
m, in line with the place where the player was held up. The attacking team throws in.
Clarification 3-2025
h and the opposing team has a potential opportunity for a quick throw-in. For the sake of the game and it ... r, when the ball goes into touch and a quick throw-in is possible for the opposing team. At what poin ... h and a quick throw-in is possible for the opposing team. At what point is the offside player put back onsid ... g in the right direction. The throwing-in team have a choice to make when the bal
Clarification 3-2012
d front row replacement for any reason, the team concerned shall not be entitled to replace the playe
Clarification 3-2018
A and that team have exhausted all of its substitutions, is a temporary replacement allowed? If the HI ... r the procedures FAQ’s – Question 20 20. If a player is removed from play for an HIA and that team have exhauste
Clarification 2-2004
n a team use either one depending on the necessity? We suggest the team can have suitable traine
Clarification 4-2005
d for player No.17 ends? Is there any difference if the team does not have any further front ro ... s, providing the team has only 14 players on the field. Ruling 2 Player No. 6 can return to the fiel
Clarification 2-2009 (1)
g of the ball in in-goal and touch-in-goal is not covered by Law. The team that was going forwar ... d) Scrum after any other stoppage. After any stoppage or irregularity not covered by Law, the tea
Clarification 2-2014
n on when a team can opt not to take the conversion and to instead restart play, what happen ... r or the TMO is consulted) which results in the clock going past 0.00?Lastly, if the team chooses not to tak
Clarification 3-2014
n or restart play?In relation to the timing restriction on when a team can opt not to take the conversio ... g past 0.00?Lastly, if the team chooses not to take the conversion do they have to be set to tak
Clarification 4-2016
d in Law any infringement by the kicker’s team results in a scrum at the mark. The opposing team thro
Clarification 1-2022
m each team on a loose ball? How should play be restarted when there is doubt about groundin ... e there is doubt about who grounded the ball first, Law 21.17 declares a restart of a 5m scrum, attacking tea ... m from the goal line, in line with where the ball became dead. The attacking team throws in. Unde
Clarification 8-2004
t The JRFU has requested a ruling with regard Law 15-Tackle. Team B ball carrier (“B-player”) is "held" (not tackled) by two Team A players (“A1-”, “A2-player”) and A1-player held on to the legs of ... r, as the result, A2 player is closer to the Team-B's goal line than B-player. Then B-player went to the groun
Clarification 7-2005
d that: "If the hindmost foot of a team is on or behind that team's goal-line, the off-side lin
Clarification 9-2006
Ruling in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification9-2006Union / HP Ref ManagerFFRLaw Reference17Date2006-11-29Request The FFR has requested a ruling with regard to Law 17 Maul 1. During a maul the ball carrier and one of his team mates leave the maul. a. Can an opponent tackle the ball carrier? b. Does the ball carrier have to be the lead player? 2. During a mau
Clarification 4-2024
e and one water bottle, (solely for the kicker’s use) after a team has indicated they intend to kic ... y a kicking tee and one water bottle, (solely for the kicker’s use) after a team has indicated they inten
Clarification 4-2015
y calls the referee and tells him that a player from the winning team was clearly offside in the ruc ... m, lineout, an option to the non-infringing team, drop out or after a conversion or successful penalt
Clarification 4-2002
d on the ground, the referee will allow the non-offending team to take a quick tap penalty/free kic ... m. The opportunity to play advantage by allowing the non-offending team to take a quick tap penalty/free kic
Clarification 1-2019
n used; A player is then suspected of concussion by the Team Doctor and is removed from pla
Clarification 1-2003
y to the receiver of the non-throwing team. (2) The receiver who has run into the lineout and doe
Clarification 6-2005
e if the team does not have any further front row replacements (for No. 17)? Ruling of the designate
Clarification 2-2009
2 metre drop out to the defending team.
Clarification 1-2011
r to the injury to the front row player and the team has used all its replacement players in which cas
Clarification 7-2014
Clarification in Law by the Designated Members of the Rugby CommitteeClarification7-2014Union / HP Ref ManagerFPRLaw Reference20Date2014-11-26Request The Federação Portuguesa de Rugby seeks clarification on the interpretation of Laws 20.9 (b) and (c). Scenario Team A are awarded a scrum. After winning the ball in the ensuing scrum, the hindmost player in that scrum grasps the ball with his fee
Clarification 7-2015
d be a penalty against the offending team.
Clarification 5-2016
M = Try https://youtu.be/Qh2ABCXf1Z8 = New decision - 22m drop out as kicking team took ball into in goa
Clarification 2-2024
4 - the opposing team may begin their attempt to block the kick. Like in the JRFU example
Clarification 3-2011
w would presumably apply and offside players (potentially an entire team) must retire 10m from wher
Clarification 5-2014
o members of that team from participating further in the game; this does not seem equitable and is contrar